SSD Brands To Avoid – List of 5 Worst SSD Brands

Are you in the market for a new SSD but unsure which brand to choose? Before making a costly mistake, read on to find out which SSD brands to avoid at all costs.

SSDs outperform traditional mechanical hard drives in terms of speed and durability. Buying an SSD is the best choice if you want to replace your old hard drive or need more storage.

So, before making a final decision on a brand, it is important to know the SSD brands to avoid purchasing.

To help you choose the right one, our team has done its research and collect relevant information from various customer forums and e-commerce websites.

SamsungSSD 860 EVOUp to 4TBFast transfer speedPoor warranty and service; too many software issues
SabrentRocket 4 Plus1TB-4TBTop speed; Phison E18 controllerPoor after-sale services; only one year warranty
SK HynixGold P31Up to 1TB4D NAND flash; good for gamersMeager software; no AES 256-bit encryption; slow clone speed
KingstonV300Up to 240GBGood performance; LSI controllerSlow write speed; unreliable; dead on arrival
ADATASU630Up to 960GBHigh speed; clear softwareRecording speed reduced once SLC-cache is full; only two years warranty; longevity issue

SSD Brands To Avoid

SSD Brands To Avoid

Here are the worst SSD brands that you need to know before buying.

1. Samsung – SSD 860 EVO

Although SATA 3 isn’t as standard as it once was, the Samsung 860 Pro shows that the aging interface still has plenty of life left in it.

The Samsung 860 Pro is one of the best SSDs with storage of up to 4TB. It also has the fastest transfer speed with exceptional security.

Despite having many qualities, the SSD 860 has received various negative remarks against it.

The following are the most common issues reported by its users.

  • Poor warranty and service
  • Too many software issues
  • Compatibility issues for AMD users
  • Mislabeled
  • Not durable

2. Sabrent – Rocket 4 Plus

The Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus is the latest addition to Sabrent’s NVMe PCIe Gen4 portfolio. The Rocket 4 Plus is available in 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB capacities.

It has got the attention of many gamers because of its top speed. Furthermore, the latest Phison E18 controller is used for the first time in the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus.

There are the following drawbacks you may have in Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus.

  • Poor after-sale services
  • Only one year warranty
  • Decline in performance after one year
  • Unstable speeds
  • Dead on arrival

3. SK Hynix – Gold P31

Gamers, programmers, and content creators will appreciate the SK Hynix Gold P31 internal SSD. It is equipped with the company’s 4D NAND flash.

However, it may not be the fastest SSD on the market since it still uses the PCIe 3.0 interface.

On the contrary, the market is witnessing an increasing number of PCIe 4.0 options.

The reasons for including the Gold P31 on the list of SSD brands to avoid are as follows.

  • Meager software
  • No AES 256-bit encryption
  • Dull looks
  • Slow Clone speed
  • Lacks SSD toolbox

4. Kingston – V300

The Kingston V300 has an excellent performance profile that has enticed its users.

However, since it uses a SandForce LSI controller, it has a disadvantage in terms of write speeds. It is also one of the slowest SSDs in the market.

The following are the reasons for its users’ dissatisfaction.

  • Slow write speed
  • Average quality
  • Dead on arrival
  • No Cloning software
  • Unreliable

5. ADATA – SU630

ADATA SU630 is among the first SSDs in the market to have 3D V-NAND QLC memory, and it comes in 240, 480, and 960 GB capacities.

It offers high speed compared to any HDD and comes with a simple and clear software SSD toolbox.

Below are the reasons to avoid this brand

  • The recording speed is reduced to low rates once the SLC-cache is full
  • Dead on arrival
  • Only two years warranty
  • Longevity issue

Final words

Since SSD intervention, it has become a popular choice over HDD due to the faster data transfer speed. However, choosing a quality SSD is not as simple as it looks.

Many low-quality SSD brands are easily accessible on the market, which are not worth buying.

These cheap SSDs do more worse than good. So, you must be aware of the worst SSD brands to avoid before buying.

In conclusion, when it comes to SSD brands, it’s important to do your research and choose wisely.

By avoiding these worst brands and considering some of the alternatives, you can ensure that you get the best performance and reliability from your SSD

Never opt for a cheap option to save a few bucks. An unknown SSD brand can make you suffer while using it on your computer.

Christopher Evans is a Mechanical Engineer and is a distinguished expert in tire and electronic appliance testing with over 15 years of experience. Holding certifications like Automotive Tire Service (TIA) and Certified Appliance Professional (CAP). He is also a member of the the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and has significantly contributed to safety standards and testing protocols in both industries. Evans is a respected speaker and award recipient.

3 thoughts on “SSD Brands To Avoid – List of 5 Worst SSD Brands”

  1. You forgot the HP S650 this SSD often comes with poor warranty and it malfunctions and goes up to 100% usage on its own, it’s the worst SSD I’ve ever tried and not only me I found several people with the same issue and they didn’t get it fixed so they just replaced it.

  2. Just had a SSD die on me: It was a Adata SU630. I had no idea they were to be avoided.
    It developed problems at a frightening speed. As it was partitioned for a dual-boot: Zorin Linux and Win 10 it wouldn’t boot the Linux partition but I could get into Windows.
    Immediately after it wouldn’t boot anything.

    We all know what a PIA a re-install is, never mind the data you inevitably lose.
    Do you have a ‘Top 5’ list to help me choose my next SSD?

  3. SU630 are SO BAD
    used to sell them during 2019-2020 but about half of them returned dead after a year, oem gave us 3 year warranty, but im just using them for gaming machines with no important data, and or replacing with more costier WD blues with 5 year warranty and faster cells.
    I just got one 960gb as replacement and its slow AF slower than the customers HDD i was replacing. temperature reading is stucvk at 14ºc
    Ive had issues with the Adata nvme drives as well, avoid like the plague!


Leave a Comment